Kshitij Parashar
Delhi
Kshitij has over three years experience advising clients on Intellectual Property disputes, debt recovery matters, arbitration and consumer protection law.
He has particular experience in handling disputes related to enforcement of intellectual property rights, especially patent disputes, trade secrets and other related matters.
Kshitij has regularly represented a variety of clients across industry sectors, including Pharmaceuticals, Technology, Media and Telecommunications, Consumer Retail (including high end fashion brands), Real Estate and Infrastructure.
In his spare time, Kshitij enjoys watching TV series and documentaries and he reads fiction.
Before joining INDUSLAW, Kshitij was associated with Anand & Anand.
publications
Financial Services & Government & Regulatory
THE UNREGULATED DEPOSITS SCHEMES BILL, 2018
In March 2018, the Union Cabinet approved the introduction of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Bill, 2018 (the 'Bill') and on 18 June 2018,...
Litigation & Dispute ResolutionProjects & Project FinanceGovernment & Regulatory & Energy, Infrastructure & Natural Resources
THE SPECIFIC RELIEF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2018: OVERVIEW...
The Specific Relief (Amendment) Act which came into force at the beginning of August broadly makes specific performance a general rule, rather than a limited...
Intellectual Property & Litigation & Dispute Resolution
DELHI HIGH COURT ALLOWS COMPOSITE SUIT FOR...
The Delhi High Court recently held that two causes of action, one with respect to passing off and another with respect to design infringement under...
Intellectual Property & Litigation & Dispute Resolution
SUPREME COURT SETS ASIDE DELHI HIGH COURT...
On January 8, 2019, the Supreme Court over-ruled a decision of the Delhi High Court, which held that Monsanto's patent for technology to genetically modify...
Litigation & Dispute Resolution & Technology, Media & Telecommunications
DELHI HIGH COURT EXERCISES LONG-ARM JURISDICTION, DIRECTS...
On October 23, 2019, the Delhi High Court held that Indian courts can issue orders to internet intermediaries like Facebook, Google, and Twitter to take...
Intellectual Property
Infolex Newsletter-IP December 2019
At the outset, we take this opportunity to wish you all a very happy and prosperous New Year 2020! This newsletter brings to you the...
Intellectual Property
Infolex Newsletter - IP
While the entire world has been witnessing the coronavirus pandemic since the beginning of 2020, some interesting updates took place in the intellectual property arena...
Intellectual Property & Technology, Media & Telecommunications
Article - Amazon vs. Amway
In the second round of litigation between E-commerce platforms such as Amazon, Flipkart and Snapdeal (“E-commerce platformsâ€) and Direct Selling Entities (“DSEsâ€) such as Amway,...
Intellectual Property
IP Newsletter – October 2020
In times of the coronavirus pandemic, while the world strives to restore a semblance of normalcy, the field of intellectual property continued to witness some...
Intellectual Property
IP Newsletter – January 2021
As the world continues to struggle to adjust to the new normal, the field of Intellectual Property has seen major developments. In these times, the...
Intellectual Property
IP Newsletter - May 2021
As our country witnesses the second wave of the coronavirus pandemic and its impact, we continue to witness some interesting case updates that took place...
Intellectual Property
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY UPDATES FROM INDIA
While the pandemic continues to heavily influence businesses, it hasn’t necessarily brought intellectual property ideation, protection, commercialization and enforcement to a halt. In fact, businesses...
Intellectual Property
IP Newsletter – January 2022
This edition of the IP newsletter discusses in detail the development in jurisprudence led by Courts in areas of patents, trade marks and copyrights. The...
Intellectual Property
WHO IS AN AVERAGE CONSUMER WITH IMPERFECT...
The Delhi High Court recently denied injunction to the brand owner of "Rooh Afza" in a suit for trade mark infringement brought against the defendant...